Symptomatic and functional recovery after transurethral resection of bladder tumor: Data from ecological momentary symptom assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively describe the nature, severity, and duration of symptoms and functional impairment during recovery from transurethral resection of bladder tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients scheduled for transurethral resection were approached for enrollment in a text-message based ecological momentary symptom assessment platform. Nine patients reported outcomes were measured 7 days before surgery and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 using a 5-point Likert scale. Self-reported degree of hematuria was collected using a visual scale. Clinical data was collected via retrospective chart review. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were analyzed. Postoperative symptoms were overall mild, with the largest differences from baseline to postoperative day 1 seen in dysuria (median 0/5 vs. 3/5) and ability to work (median 5/5 vs. 4/5). Recovery was generally rapid, with 76% of patients reporting ≥4/5 agreement with the statement "I feel recovered from surgery" by postoperative day 2, although 15% of patients reported persistently lower levels of agreement on postoperative day 10 or 14. Patients undergoing larger resections (≥2cm) did take longer to return to baseline in multiple symptom domains, but the difference of medians vs. those undergoing smaller resections was less than 1 day across all domains. Multivariable analysis suggested that receiving perioperative intravesical chemotherapy was associated with longer time to recovery. 84% of patients reported clear yellow urine by postoperative day 3. CONCLUSION: In this population, hematuria and negative effects on quality of life resulting from transurethral resection of bladder tumors were generally mild and short-lived, although a small number of patients experienced longer recoveries.

Clinical predictors of immediate intervention for isolated renal trauma.

INTRODUCTION Evidence suggests overutilization of procedural intervention for renal traumas. The objective of this study was to assess clinical factors associated with procedural intervention for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with isolated renal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A United States statewide trauma registry was queried for trauma patients presenting to level I or II trauma centers with isolated renal injuries (Grades I-V) from 2000-2013. Patient demographics, mechanism, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade, trauma center level designation, presenting ED vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), intubation status, and blood product transfusion were assessed. RESULTS: Of 449,422 patients, 1383 patients (78% male, median age 29 years [range 2-92]) with isolated renal injuries had data available for analysis. Controlling for demographics, presenting vitals, GCS, trauma center level, mechanism and intubation status, level I status (OR 2.1 [1.3-3.4], p = 0.0021), white race (OR 2.5 [1.3-4.7], p < 0.005), AAST IV/V injury (OR 4.79 [3.1-6.5], p < 0.0001) and blood product administration (OR 2.7 [1.5-4.9], p = 0.0009) were independently associated with an immediate interventional radiology procedure. Independent predictors of immediate surgical intervention include level I status (OR 2.2 [1.2-4.0], p = 0.0075), penetrating mechanism of injury (OR 15.6 [8.4-28.9], p < 0.0001, AAST IV/V injury (OR 13.6 [8.7-21.1], p < 0.0001), and clinical hypotension (SBP < 95 mmHg, OR 2.1 [1.1 4.2], p = 0.03). CONCVLUSION: Level 1 trauma center designation, white race, penetrating mechanism of injury, high-grade injury, transfusion of blood products, and hypotension were all independent predictors of immediate procedural intervention following ED presentation with isolated renal trauma.

Optimal Modeling: an Updated Method for Safely and Effectively Eliminating Curvature During Penile Prosthesis Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes of a variant of traditional modeling ("optimal modeling," OM) in patients with residual curvature following prosthesis implantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent penile implant insertion. Patients with >30° of residual curvature after cylinder placement and inflation underwent OM and were compared 1:1 to a demographically-matched cohort who received implantation without ancillary straightening. Optimal modeling was performed by forcibly bending the erect penis in the direction opposite the point of maximal curvature while maintaining glanular pressure to prevent urethral injury. This was performed for 90-second intervals for as many cycles as necessary to achieve <15° curvature. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included in the final analysis; 40 (50.0%) underwent optimal modeling while 40 (50.0%) did not need additional straightening following surgery. The mean premodeling curvature was 47.8° (range 30°-90°) while post-modeling curvature improved to a mean of 10.6° (range 0°-30°, P < .001); 87.5% of patients had <15° of residual curvature. Patients in the OM cohort experienced longer operative times (82.7 vs 75.8 min, P = .15). No patient in either group experienced an intraoperative or postoperative complication at a mean follow-up of 29.9 months. CONCLUSION: Although many prosthetic urologists forego manual modeling in cases of moderate-severe penile curvature, our contemporary series shows it to be both safe and effective. OM may preclude the need for more time-consuming and complex surgical procedures.

Frailty Assessments in Surgical Practice: What is Frailty and How Can It Be Used in Prosthetic Health?

INTRODUCTION: Surgical frailty is a previously unrecognized clinical entity that objectifies a multiorgan decrease in physiologic reserve in those undergoing surgery. Although penile implantation has been demonstrated to be an effective means of restoring erectile function in patients whose previous conservative measures have failed, there are limited data regarding the assessment of frailty in patients undergoing penile implantation. AIM: To review the various objective methods used to describe surgical frailty in medical and surgical disciplines, report on methodologies of frailty assessment, and discuss the relevance of surgical frailty in the preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis. METHODS: A literature review was performed through PubMed regarding surgical frailty in the disciplines of medicine, surgery, and urology. Key words and phrases included frailty, elderly, aging, erectile dysfunction, penile implantation, and penile prosthesis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Critical assessment of frailty in medicine and its application to male prosthetic health. RESULTS: Frailty has been assessed by different metrics in multiple fields. Validated modalities to determine physiologic reserve include an accumulation of deficits and phenotypic objective assessments that are reviewed in detail. Frail patients experience longer length of stay, postoperative complications, unplanned returns to the operating room, and readmissions and are less likely to be discharged to home. Novel frailty assessments objectified through grip strength measurements from our institution demonstrate that a considerable number of patients, young and old, undergoing penile implantation exhibit surgical frailty. CONCLUSION: There is a growing need to incorporate frailty assessment in the preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing penile implantation. Grip strength evaluation seems to be an obvious standard because it is likely the easiest to measure and is clinically relevant given the user's dependence on manual dexterity to use the device. Screening for frailty does not create a substantial time, financial, or resource burden for the urologist. Brennan MS, Barlotta RM, Simhan J. Frailty Assessments in Surgical Practice: What is Frailty and How Can It Be Used in Prosthetic Health? Sex Med Rev 2018;6:302-309.